Well, okay, no ears were bitten off last night, in fact. I watched until almost ten o'clock, when I had lost track of the number of times Cheney said the words "terror" or "terrorist(s)." I was trying to keep a count, but somewhere around 25 I lost it. Keeping track of the number of lies the VP told was even harder. He can't open his mouth without lying, evidently. Here, just for fun, is a Washington Post article from last week that shows up some of those lies for the fiction they are.
(P. S. Later the same day: I just found another blogger who was also counting, and he says that Cheney mentioned the word "terrorist(s)" thirty one times. Sounds a little low to me, but you get the picture. He also uses a word apropos Dick Cheney that AOL probably won't like, but I certainly do. Calls him a "douchebag." I actually haven't heard that term for quite a while.)
washingtonpost.com / U.S. Effort Aims to Improve Opinions About Iraq Conflict
By Dana Milbank and Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, September 30, 2004; Page A20
The Bush administration, battling negative perceptions of the Iraq war, is sending Iraqi Americans to deliver what the Pentagon calls "good news" about Iraq to U.S. military bases, and has curtailed distribution of reports showing increasing violence in that country.
The unusual public-relations effort by the Pentagon and the U.S. Agency for International Development comes as details have emerged showing the U.S. government and a representative of President Bush's reelection campaign had been heavily involved in drafting the speech given to Congress last week by interim Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi. Combined, they indicate that the federal government is working assiduously to improve Americans' opinions about the Iraq conflict -- a key element of Bush's reelection message.
USAID said this week that it will restrict distribution of reports by contractor Kroll Security International showing that the number of daily attacks by insurgents in Iraq has increased. On Monday, a day after The Washington Post published a front-page storysaying that "the Kroll reports suggest a broad and intensifying campaign of insurgent violence," a USAID official sent an e-mail to congressional aides stating: "This is the last Kroll report to come in. After the WPost story, they shut it down in order to regroup. I'll let you know when it restarts."
Asked about the Kroll reports yesterday, USAID spokesman Jeffrey Grieco said, "The agency has restricted its circulation to those contractors and grantees who continue to work in Iraq." He said that the reports were given to congressional officials who sought them, but that the information will now be "restricted to those who need it for security planning in Iraq." An agency official said the decision was unrelated to the Post story and was based on a fear that the reports "would fall into insurgents' hands."
Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's office has sent commanders of U.S. military facilities a five-page memorandum titled "Guidance to Commanders." The Pentagon, the memo says, is sponsoring a group of Iraqi Americans and former officials from the Coalition Provisional Authority to speak at military bases throughout the United States starting Friday to provide "a first-hand account" of events in Iraq. The Iraqi Americans and the CPA officials worked on establishing the interim Iraqi government. The Iraqi Americans "feel strongly that the benefits of the coalition efforts have not been fully reported," the memo says.
The memo says the presentations are "designed to be uplifting accounts with good news messages." Rumsfeld's office, which will pay for the tour, recommends that the installations seek local news coverage, noting that "these events and presentations are positive public relations opportunities."
The memo anticipates controversy. "It is well understood that the efforts and sacrifices associated with Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom have resulted in a significant human toll," it says. "As such, emotions and apprehensions may run high in response to the conduct of these visits." The memo offered reassurance that those on the tour "are not political policy makers" and said commanders at each base "are in the best position on how to market this voluntary attendance program effectively."
Lt. Col. Joe Richard, a Pentagon spokesman, said most of the Iraqi Americans are teachers who will emphasize improvements made to the Iraqi education system. He said they want to "provide some perspective on theoperation" in Iraq. "I wouldn't characterize it as unusual. There are provisions that allow for it."
At the White House, National Security Council spokesman Jim Wilkinson said the Iraqi Americans have "a legitimate perspective, and that perspective should be heard."
White House spokesman Scott McClellan, asked Tuesday about similarities between Bush's statements about Iraq and Allawi's speech to Congress last week, said he did not know of any help U.S. officials gave with the speech. "None that I know of," he said, adding, "No one at the White House." He also said he did not know if the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad had seen the speech.
But administration officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the prime minister was coached and aided by the U.S. government, its allies and friends of the administration. Among them was Dan Senor, former spokesman for the CPA who has more recently represented the Bush campaign in media appearances. Senor, who has denied writing the speech, sent Allawi recommended phrases. He also helped Allawi rehearse in New York last week, officials said. Senor declined to comment.
The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and British Foreign Service officials also helped Allawi with the text and delivery of his remarks, said administration officials who were involved. The State Department and officials elsewhere in the government took the lead in booking Allawi's interviews. Administration officials said that the Iraqi Embassy in Washington consists of just a few officials and has only a dial-up Internet connection, so was incapable of preparing for the high-profile tour.
Staff writers Al Kamen, Thomas E. Ricks and Robin Wright contributed to this
4 comments:
My friend, glad to see you're posting in spite of your busy sked. Edwards derailed Cheney's attacks on Bush and instead put him on the defensive and forced him to use lies, evasion and nasty personal attacks--that proved inaccurate--just to stay afloat.
Throught Taegan Goddard, here's a neat tool from blogger Cameron Marlow that will tell you exactly how many times Cheney used the word "terror" and other scare tactics: http://overstated.net/04/10/06-vice-presidential-debate-.asp.
The more I talked with people yesterday -- not just the three I called first thing (and the basis for my earlier comment about an "even" exchange) -- the more an Edwards all-out victory seem to emerge. Chaney's blatant gaffs about not meeting Edwards and the totally wrong website address, got a lot of play in our local press and airways. More importantly, this debate, like the first Presidential debate, has energized the Democrats and put the Bush/Chaney supporters on the defensive. Is it my imagination or am I really seeing a lot more "Kerry/Edwards" bumper stickers and yard signs these last six days? What's it like in Delaware? And are your readers seeing the same phenom in their states?
And, yes, I do know that Mr. Cheney spells his name with an e and not an a. Hey, I haven't had my second cup of coffee yet. I'm lucky to think in complete sentences, much less spell. :-)
Oh, is this all a sham and a disgrace or what? I try to be respectful of everybody's opinion, but the people who are just blindly supporting Bush frighten me. Great post, thank you for information I didn't have.
I hope one of these days to meet you neighbor! :):) judi
Post a Comment