Thursday, October 28, 2004

ABUSE ABOUNDING

How about them Red Sox?  I can't imagine Boston last night.  Madness in the streets.  Hopefully no one else got shot in the madness.  I'm happy for the Sox, for my former city, for the rising of the underdogs everywhere.  But I hate the whole "free agent" thing.  I liked it when teams stayed together and you could really be a loyal fan to a whole group of guys for a long time.  Ah well, I'm an old fart, there's no denying that.

And this morning I have Arianna Huffington's last column pre the election to offer you.  On a subject I have been mulling and stewing, ranting and raving, choking and gagging over in the past weeks more than ever.  It's what she calls "faith abuse."  She links to Ron Suskind's article in the NYT magazine a couple of weeks ago, I think it was Oct. 27, a hair-raising look at how this president is making decisions, running a government, a war, and ultimately all our lives.  I've wanted to write a post linking to the NYT article as well as several other sites where this is being discussed, and haven't had the time.  Now, Arianna has done it for me.  I don't know that anything anyone says will deter those who see all this as America's salvation from voting for Bush, but the rest of us need to do everything we can to alert sane voters and get them to the polls.

FAITH ABUSE: WHEN GOD BECOMES A CAMPAIGN PLOY

By Arianna Huffington

This is my last column before Election Day. With less than a week to go, I plan on doing everything in my power to defeat George W. Bush (need a ride to the polls?). Then I'm going to get down on my knees and pray to a higher power.

As someone for whom faith is incredibly important, and who regularly prays for all the people and things that matter to me, I'm hopeful that God is as appalled as I am with the way His name is constantly being taken in vain on the Bush campaign trail, and with how the president is abusing his faith to justify to himself and to the world his disastrous policies.

Lord knows there's a very long list of things to be angry with Bush about, but this one has moved to the top of my personal hit parade because, as Catholic theologians teach us, "The corruption of the best is the worst." And George W. is truly corrupting faith and dragging it into the political gutter. In two fundamental ways:

First, he's using it as a spiritual inoculation against uncertainty and complexity.

Ron Suskind's recent piece  in the New York Times Magazine painted a chilling portrait of a presidency in which thoughtful analysis and moral questioning have been replaced by "God-given" certainty, and where facts and open debate have become an anathema.

Suskind reveals a president who uses his faith to numb himself against reality. It anesthetizes him in the same way a stiff drink — OK, 20 stiff drinks — used to, and allows him to drown out the voices of doubt. Yet great thinkers throughout history have extolled the virtues of doubt. As Paul Tillich put it: "Doubt isn't the opposite of faith; it is an element of faith."

But not in the Bush White House, where doubters are treated as traitors, and inconvenient facts are the work of the Devil — because facts can lead to questioning, and questioning undermines faith. And that would be blasphemy in an Oval Office where unbending resolve has become a holy sacrament. No wonder Bush is unwilling to admit to even a single mistake.

The second way the president is corrupting his faith is by using it as a marketing tool designed to garner support among the over 60 million Americans who identify themselves as evangelical — particularly the 4 million born-again voters who stayed home in 2000.

Nowhere is this blending of church and campaign more evident than in "George W. Bush: Faith in the White House," a DVD being distributed to tens of thousands of America's churches.

Although not officially the work of the Bush-Cheney campaign, it obviously has its approval, and indeed was screened at a party for Christian conservatives hosted by the campaign at the GOP convention in New York.

In the documentary, President Bush is presented as a man with "the moral clarity of an old-fashioned biblical prophet" — and is shown sharing a beatific split screen with the Son of God himself.

So, in 2004, Jesus is not only the president's favorite philosopher — he's his surrogate running mate. I'm surprised we haven't seen any "Bush-Christ 2004" bumper stickers yet. It would make for a heck of an October surprise.

All this pious posturing is also being used as a cudgel with which to attack John Kerry, portraying him as a sorry second in the faith sweepstakes.

Forget that Kerry carries a Bible and a rosary with him on the campaign trail, used to be an altar boy, and has said, "My faith affects everything that I do." The Bushies have made it seem as if they are running against Joe Pagan. Just check out the "Kerry: Wrong for Catholics" page  on the official Bush-Cheney campaign Web site.

What's next? Attack ads from Altar Boys for Truth claiming Kerry never actually swallowed the body of Christ during communion?

What the president calls faith is actually nothing of the sort. It is fanaticism, pure and simple. The defining trait of the fanatic is an utter refusal to allow anything as piddling as evidence to get in the way of an unshakable belief.

This zealot's mindset is what allows President Bush to take in the death and destruction in Iraq and see them as "freedom on the march." And it's also what allows Abu Zarqawi and his followers to coldly put a bullet in the back of the head of four-dozen unarmed Iraqi Army recruits because they are "apostates."

"Either you're with us or you're against us" plainly cuts both ways.

"This is why George W. Bush is so clear-eyed about al-Qaida and the Islamic fundamentalist enemy," explained Bruce Bartlett, a domestic policy advisor to Reagan and Bush 41. "He understands them because he's just like them."

I pray that every American of real faith keeps this in mind when stepping into the voting booth on Election Day.

© 2004 ARIANNA HUFFINGTON.
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.

 

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ohhh I liked that article. I've been decided for a long time and plan on voting asap on Tuesday. I've taken what limited time I have off of work that day. This is the most important election in some time. There are two routes to go...north to freedom or south to Hell. ;) Thanks for sharing. :)

Anonymous said...

Great joy in Beantown and everywhere else over last night's victory.  I believe the World Series was just the overture for a sweet Massachusetts sweep that will culminate next Tuesday.  I admire and appreciate all the hard work you have invested in this election.  You have made a difference!  Last minute campaign hint: distribute copies of the Washington Post's Kerry Endorsement editorial (last Sunday's Post) to an many friends as possible.  I have found this well-reasoned, well-written editoiral VERY effective in moving the "undecided" voters over to Kerry.  Again, Bravo Sox! Bravo Kerry! Bravo You!

Anonymous said...

I'm glad that the Red Sox won, it sure was a Cinderella story.  My elation remain unmarred by one of the players making it a point to endorse Bush, hrmph.

Ron Suskind's article was very damning, and the reason why I changed the subtitle of De Profundis to "member of the reality-based community".  This article by Arianna is the icing on the cake.

Anonymous said...

Very good entry as always. Profoundly 'thinkable'. Oh, I wish I was on the shore today. Thank you for all your love and friendship :) judi