Thursday, April 28, 2005

BRIEF AQUAMARINE THOUGHTS

Overfooling-around with the colors on this journal has made it look quite a bit like a swimming pool, doncha think?

I'm over my head, drowning, not in a swimming pool, but in end-of-semester stuff.  Won't be doing any significant posting until mid-May, though I may do some insignificant writing, you never know.

I do wish to say that I am, very slowly, reading a book by Thom Hartmann called The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight, subtitled "The Fate of the World and What We Can Do Before It's Too Late."  I suggest that anyone interested in the future of our planet and our species buy a copy, read it, then pass it on to someone you care about.  Even better, buy multiple copies and pass them out to several people you care about.  It's my current belief that it's already too late, but I haven't yet gotten to the part where I learn what we can do.   

High spring here now.  Sitting inside grading tests is serious torture.  But, it must be done.  Go outside for me, and let me know about it.  I'll enjoy it vicariously.

Saturday, April 23, 2005

PERSONALITY PROFILE

I didn't do Patrick's "Saturday Six," which is today found at his alternative blog on blogspot, because I just can't figure out leaving comments on blogspot.  However, I did take the quiz he mentions in one of the six questions, and these are my results:

                   I  N  F  P
I  =  introverted
N =  Intuitive
F =   Feeling
P =   perceiving

I have to be amazed at how accurate these are, with the strongest emphasis on the "F" for feeling.  For better or for worse, it's my default operating mode. It's a long list of questions, but fun.  There are various interpretations of your results to read once you get your score.  Here's a list of fellow sufferers with my profile (and I've gotta wonder how many of them are also Cancers):

Famous INFPs:

Homer
Virgil
Mary, mother of Jesus
St. John, the beloved disciple
St. Luke; physician, disciple, author
William Shakespeare, bard of Avon
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (Evangeline)
A. A. Milne (Winnie the Pooh)
Laura Ingalls Wilder (Little House on the Prairie)
Helen Keller, deaf and blind author
Carl Rogers, reflective psychologist, counselor
Fred Rogers (Mister Rogers' Neighborhood)
Dick Clark (American Bandstand)
Donna Reed, actor (It's a Wonderful Life)
Jacqueline Kennedy Onasis
Neil Diamond, vocalist
Tom Brokaw, news anchor
James Herriot (All Creatures Great and Small)
Annie Dillard (Pilgrim at Tinker Creek)
James Taylor, vocalist
Julia Roberts, actor (Conspiracy Theory, Pretty Woman)
Scott Bakula (Quantum Leap)
Terri Gross (PBS's "Fresh Air")
Amy Tan (author of The Joy-Luck Club, The Kitchen God's Wife)
John F. Kennedy, Jr.
Lisa Kudrow ("Phoebe" of Friends)
Fred Savage ("The Wonder Years")

Fictional INFPs:

Anne (Anne of Green Gables)
Calvin (Calvin and Hobbes)
Deanna Troi (Star Trek - The Next Generation)
Wesley Crusher (Star Trek - The Next Generation)
Doctor Julian Bashir (Star Trek: Deep Space 9)
Bastian (The Neverending Story)
E.T.: the ExtraTerrestrial
Doug Funny, Doug cartoons
Tommy, Rug Rats cartoons
Rocko, Rocko's Modern Life cartoons

This list of fictional characters seems remarkably short, and heavy on the SciFi and cartoons.  Surely from all of the world's literature there are more INFP characters than Anne of Green Gables?  Surely.  In fact, if we put on our thinking caps I bet we can compile a much better list.

 

Thursday, April 21, 2005

EARTH DAY, 2005

Mega approach avoidance happening here - denial of the stacks of papers, quizzes and tests on the dining room table. But, tomorrow is Earth Day, and I was planning to write a wrist-slitting post here about how little that really matters. I'm currently reading Thom Hartmann's The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight, which was first published in 1998. This is a revised and updated edition published last year. I think there will be some light at the end of the tunnel, but a third of the way through this book I'm more than depressed at what my species has done to this planet. I very much identify with Joseph Chilton Pearce's words in the Foreword to the book:

"I have long puzzled how it is that the heartbreaking and near-terrifying nature of our ecological crisis is treated casually by and large, when not completely neglected or ignored by a generally sleepwalking populace. A planetary crisis embraces everything from the personal and social to worldwide, but in spite of an occasional flurry of lip service and 'let's pretends' concerning the avalance of disasters we are perpetrating, most of our gestures (a bit of recycling, a bit less driving, turning down the heat or AC, sending a check to the Sierra Club) seem to serve only to relieve our guilty conscience or mask our growing feeling of impotence. Nothing much is happening, at any rate, to halt our downward plunge."

Yes, yes and yes. "Growing feeling of impotence" is exactly it. The current issue (May/June) of Mother Jones focuses on climate change, that monster lurking under the bed that this country refuses to believe in. Interestingly (though hardly surprisingly) enough, Exxon Mobil is contributing largely to our refusal to believe. Here is a link to a chart showing the think tanks and policy groups that Exxon has recently funded. These are among the loudest voices proclaiming all the science of climate change and global warming to be hokum. This chart is further explained in the article "Some Like it Hot" in the "As the World Burns" collection of pieces on the subject. If you don't have time to read the articles, or UNTIL you have time to read the articles, here is an interactive map showing the global hot spots - fun for the whole family!

But wait - I said I "was about to" write a wrist-slitting post - ""what is this," you may ask, "if NOT one?" It is a journey through my evening's online reading - but it has a somewhat more upbeat ending. Kelpie Wilson writes for Truthout.org, one of the best liberal online journals of news and opinion, on environmental issues. This is her Earth Day article, and I have to admit that - although it has a whiff of the guilt-relieving gestures Pearce mentions in his Foreword to Hartmann's book - it considerably cheered me up. Anyone who reads this journal of mine probably already practices some of the suggestions at the end of Wilson's piece. Take on a few more, and most importantly (on this day when the House passed the atrocious Energy package) keep up the pressure on your elected representatives to stand up and fight the administration's corporate-funded anti-environmental policies.

The Green Dream Is Alive
By Kelpie Wilson
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Thursday 21 April 2005

Maybe it's just the springtime, but I'm here to tell you that this Earth Day the Green Dream is alive. How can you not feel that way after you've just spent the day setting thrifty little lettuce and broccoli starts out in a well-manured field?

We've got to keep reminding ourselves of the Green Dream because, let's face it: these are hard times for green-leaning folks as we see so many of our worst Cassandra-like predictions coming true. Even those of us who have shouted about global warming for years are surprised to see how quickly the climate is changing right now. Thejust-released Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, which brought togethernearly 1,400 experts from 95 countries, told us that we have degraded nearly 60% of the planet's capacity to support life with clean air, water and food. Then there is Peak Oil. Like most environmentalists, I knew it was coming - it's basic physics - yeah, we're going to run out of oil. But I believed those bastards when they said it wouldn't happen for another 20 years. Let the grandkids worry about it.

The entire energy industry needs to be prosecuted for concealing the true state of their oil and gas reserves. The SEC has already fined Shell Oil $120 million for inflating their oil holdings in order to keep their stock price high. This is just the beginning of the unveiling of an accounting rip-off that will make Enron and WorldCom look like peanuts, if it ever gets going. Someone also needs to take the US Energy Information Agency to court for broadcasting falsely that the world-wide peak of oil production would not hit us until sometime between 2020 and 2030. Right now we don't know if the real peak is happening today or if it will happen two or three years from now, but it's clearly breathing down our necks. How on God's green earth has such incompetence been tolerated?

Well, here we are. The House Republicans want us to give another 10 billion or so in tax breaks to the fossil fuel industry to somehow motivate them to get off their duffs and find more oil. What if they gave that $10 billion back to us as rebates so we could all invest in a little personal energy independence?

Wouldn't it be great to have $10,000 to put some solar panels on your roof? Ten billion dollars could put those solar panels on 100,000 roofs. If we'd been doing that for the last ten years, we'd have a million solar roofs by now.

It's a time to plant, to invest, to give back to the Earth.

With gas prices up, President Bush now wants to talk to us about energy conservation and energy independence. Will he do it? Will he actually tell us to put on a sweater when we're cold instead of turning up the thermostat? What about car mileage standards? What will he do about the big lots full of SUVs and monster trucks that Detroit all of a sudden can't sell? How did we get here? How can we find our way back to some sanity?

The fertilizer the Green Dream needs is exactly what it is getting right now: the simple truth of our situation. The American Dream as articulated since the 1950s - the suburban, two cars in every garage, ultra-convenient, mall world dream - is history.

Once there was another version of the American Dream. Thomas Jefferson's yeoman farmers would live free and independent, producing according to their own needs and living a simple, virtuous life that would make them model citizens. This kind of self-sufficient farmer is an endangered species today. But perhaps it is a dream worth reviving. Once we find something to do with all the SUVs, we will be tearing up the suburban asphalt and planting gardens.

Do you remember the rabbit lady in Michael Moore's film "Roger and Me?" Go get that film if you haven't seen it. The rabbit lady, struggling to survive in the trashed economy of Flint, Michigan, raised and sold rabbits, her sign on the road advertising Rabbits - Pets or Meat. To me the rabbit lady is a beautiful example of American resourcefulness. We all have that kind of strength and pride, if only we would be called upon to use it.

So many of us are yearning to pitch in now, to do something, to plant a seed. Here are the usual "what you can do to save the planet" Earth Day suggestions, but instead of thinking of them as chores to add to an already endless list, think of them as investments in a better future.

  1. Get your body in shape. We'll all be walking and biking a lot more in the future, so we might as well start now. And it's so good for you. Getting in shape does not mean getting skinny. Fat is good for you too. Just keep it moving.
  2. Eat good food. Try to eat whole, unprocessed food like rice and vegetables, organically grown and locally grown if possible. Food processing and transport use a lot of energy. At the same time, over-processed food zaps your personal energy.
  3. Buy some power strips. Check every single appliance you have plugged into a wall outlet and see if it draws current even when the switch is turned off. If it is warm to the touch it's drawing current. Lots of devices suck these "vampire loads" so we won't have to wait for them to warm up when we turn them on. Plug them into the power strip and turn them all the way off. Turn them back on when you need them - and wait.
  4. Buy a bunch of super-efficient light bulbs (either compact fluorescents or the new high efficiency LED lights) and replace every incandescent bulb in your house with one.
  5. Plant a garden. Even if it's just a window box with some lettuces or a tomato plant in a pot on the deck. Join with friends and plant a community garden and make it fun! Raise rabbits.
  6. Invest in solar electricity, solar heating and energy efficient appliances. The payback time in power bill savings may be a little long right now, but when energy prices shoot through the roof, you'll be glad you did.

Below I've added a few Internet links for further exploration. Happy Earth Day!

Fat is not so bad.
http://www.truthout.org/issues_05/042005HC.shtml

Good fat is good (the new food pyramid).
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050420/sfw099.html?.v=6

How to kill vampire loads and a host of energy conservation tips.
http://www.energyconservationinfo.org/almanac.htm

My favorite energy education site.
http://www.energyquest.ca.gov/

LED lights may soon replace bulbs.
http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20950~2818906,00.html

Kids can sell energy saving light bulbs to raise money for school projects.
http://www.uwsp.edu/cnr/wcee/keep/studentinvolvement/

A source of LED lights, solar modulesand energy saving appliances.
http://www.realgoods.com

Urban vs. Rural Sustainability
http://www.energybulletin.net/3757.html

End of Suburbia
http://www.friendsofthetrees.net/2005article_endofsuburbia.htm

Peak Oil and Permaculture in the Suburbs
http://www.postcarbon.org/

Homepower Magazine
http://www.homepower.org

This site has a database of solar installers.
http://www.seia.org/

Database of state incentives for renewable energy.
http://www.dsireusa.org/

Solar Today - Magazine of the American Solar Energy Society
http://www.solartoday.org/

The National Renewable Energy Lab
http://www.nrel.gov

 

Wednesday, April 20, 2005

WHERE THE HELL HAVE I BEEN?

On April 6th I wrote that it would be a "slow to nonexistant journal week,"  as life has become suddenly so full of "real" stuff that there just isn't the time to spend seated at the computer browsing news, environmental sites and magazines, and then writing.  The busy week has become two weeks now, and looks likely to last for at least two and a half more.  Or:  until the semester is over. 

The weather turned lovely, and the yard and gardens demand what time work doesn't.  I neglected so much last spring and summer while I was working on the campaigns, that there is twice the normal spring whipping-into-shape to be done. We plan to put the house on the market early next spring - getting this ridiculous yard looking seductively attractive will help a great deal with the sale..

Reading a book called The Memory of Running  (discussed in The BiblioPhiles) reminded me that there were two bikes decomposing in the garage.  I dug them out, took them to Bike Werkz and had them revived - new tires, brakes, a good cleaning, chains oiled.  I'm talking about two probably 25 year old Raleigh three-speeds here, folks, not your spiffy new 18 speed lightweight racing bike.  The adorable kid who worked on them was entranced by what he regarded as antiques.  Anyway, I'm riding mine everywhere possible now, and it just feels great.  Today I may even work up the courage to ride to the college, crossing the highway. 

The Language Dept at the college had a wonderful International Day - I have pictures, but haven't had time to download them yet.  At La Casita, the afternoon homework program, we had a Book Fair that lasted an entire week and brought us in some nice extra cash for supplies and books.  I worked evenings and Saturday on that, and had too much fun.  It brought back my old Doubleday Bookstore days, reminding me how much I love to put books and people together in friendly loving relationships.

Another big event around here has been a week of terror in both my constituencies, caused by the presence of La Migra (Immigration officers) here rounding up undocumented immigrants for deportation.  Kicking in doors, stopping cars on the highway, going through Wal-Mart accosting people, climbing up to second story windows to look in when no one answers a ground floor door, stuff like that.  Scary stuff.  And it's the people who've been living here for years, holding jobs, paying taxes, sending their kids to school, whose names are on their list.  Not the folks who just came over the border last week. 

OKay, gotta go, but one last word  - about the new Pope, the only hope I see is that he's 78 years old.  This one won't last for decades, like the last one did.  God's rottweiler, indeed.

Sunday, April 10, 2005

LIFE ON OUR LONELY PLANET

It has been a week of incredible busyness, from morning til night, no time to journal, no time to research and think about anything other than making it through each day.  This lovely Sunday is a chance to take it slow, so we are, and we're about to go out into this world of spring for a beach walk and some birding.  I just wanted to say here, however, how utterly beholden to Duane (SottoVoce) I am for this comment that he left in my entry titled "Culture of Life."  It exactly expresses my deepest feelings, the reason I am an environmentalist, the reason I am so amazed that more people aren't.

Duane's comment:

Here's something from T. A. Barron, writing in the NRDC's blog...

"Today, though, I'd like to propose a new meaning for the term 'pro-life.' Even before the Terry Schiavo case, the term had become more politically charged than Tom Delay's cell phone. But the word 'life' is far too big, complex and wondrous a term to be reduced to political shorthand. Life on our lonely planet is truly a miracle, whose diversity and beauty is simply stunning to behold. Whether or not life exists elsewhere in the universe, all we know now is that here on Earth, life is both utterly amazing -- and utterly endangered. That is why I believe that nobody is really more pro-life than an environmentalist."

http://blog.nrdcactionfund.org/

Wednesday, April 6, 2005

It's gonna be a slow to nonexistant journal week.  Lots going on right now.  Today and tomorrow, however, are designated call-in days for letting your senators know you oppose the "nuclear option."  If, of course, you do in fact oppose it.  Click here for a link to send a message to your reps. 

In the meantime, a word from Rustle the Leaf:

Monday, April 4, 2005

CULTURE OF LIFE

The always-wonderful Tank Gurl (always wonderful because she writes incisive posts about current events and situations, the kind that make me grind my teeth and need blood pressure medicine, but at the same time she manages to put in her own brand of twisted humor and make me LAUGH.  same post, tooth-grinding AND laughing.) has a recent post where she ponders the question:  what could the expression "Culture of Life" actually MEAN?  And a good question it is, too, isn't it?  When looked at as the inventors of the phrase seem to do.  Today's Alternet has a good article posing (a minimal) ten items that a Culture of Life for Progressives might contain.  Here's the basic ten, looking a lot different from what we've been hearing from the Bush brothers and company lately.

At minimum, a true "culture of life" would support the following ten positions:

1. Withdraw the Troops

More than 1,500 U.S. soldiers have been killed in Iraq, along with tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians (some estimates are as high as 100,000.) Meanwhile, we're hunkering down building long-term military bases and sending more troops. How many more soldiers have to die before we set a timetable for bringing them home?

2. Stop the Death Penalty

Fifty-nine prisoners were executed last year, 23 of them in Texas alone. Yet study after study has shown the death penalty to be unequally applied by race, and hundreds of inmates have been found innocent at the eleventh hour. If we are all created in God's image, then it is up to God, not us, to deal the ultimate in punishment.

3. Pass Effective Gun Control Laws

More than 80 Americans are killed by firearms each day. Yet Congress has made it easier for criminals to get their hands on weapons -- most recently with the repeal of the assault weapons ban -- instead of following the lead of states like Massachusetts and New York, which have passed tougher laws and decreased handgun deaths.

4. Fund Social Services

Hundreds of homeless people, many of them war veterans, die on the streets each year because they can't gain access to basic services such as housing and health care. A truly compassionate person would fight against Bush's mean-spirited budget that cuts Medicaid benefits, veterans‚ health care, community services block grants, and other life-saving programs in favor of tax cuts for the rich.

5. Create Universal Health Care for Children

The U.S. remains the only industrial nation not to provide health care for all its citizens. At the very least, we could coverage to the most vulnerable among us. Meanwhile, our infant mortality rate recently rose for the first time in four decades, to 28,000 deaths a year.

6. Research Alternative Energy

It's a fact that access to the world's oil has fueled conflict in the Middle East for years. Developing wind and solar power could be the best protection we have against more of our soldiers dying overseas in the future. At the same time, reducing greenhouse gases could slow global warming, held responsible for the increasing severity of natural disasters like the Southeast Asian tsunami that claimed the lives of 175,000 people (with another 100,000 missing).

7. Investigate Prisoner Abuses

While the face of abuse of foreign detainees are those revolting pictures of torture from Abu Ghraib, even more disturbing stories of prisoners dying while in custody have trickled out of Iraq and Afghanistan. A true culture of life would conduct a full investigation into the abuse, with those responsible being held to account.

8. Support AIDS Clinics Abroad

In Bush's 2003 State of the Union, he pledged $15 billion to combat AIDS in Africa -- since then not only has the program been under-funded, but the majority of it has gone into non-generic drug treatment and abstinence-only prevention programs. With more than 3 million HIV/AIDS deaths in Africa a year, a truly compassionate AIDS policy would work immediately with the United Nations programs that have proven the most effective against the disease.

9. Implement a Fair Guestworker Program

Last year, more than 300 undocumented migrants died crossing the border to work in the U.S. There is no getting around the fact that these workers from Mexico and other countries are essential to the functioning of our economy. A fair guestworker program would not only recognize the contributions of these workers, but also prevent needless deaths.

10. Join the International Criminal Court

Ethnic cleansing, war crimes, and genocide are alive and well in the world, in places like Kosovo, Rwanda, and most recently the Sudan. Yet the U.S. is one of only a handful of countries (including China and Israel) that refuse to join the International Criminal Court. Last week, over our country's objections, the United Nations finally referred to the ICC the case of Darfur, where an estimated 300,000 Sudanese have been brutally killed.

Together, these issues account for the needless deaths of tens of thousands of people a day. A culture that valued their lives is one we could all celebrate.

Michael Blanding is a freelance writer living in Boston. Read more of his work at www.michaelblanding.com

Sunday, April 3, 2005

It's been a stormy week of spring break for me, unbelievable amount of rain and wind, but one I've spent doing a lot of sleeping, and a lot of reading.  Some good stuff over in TheBiblioPhiles, love to have you read it.  If you're just dropping in today, please read the previous two entries in this journal too, and please take the time to take some action.  This may be the week the Senate takes on this whole meshuganah mess. 

A lot of my reading this week, internet reading that is, has taken me in a somewhat new and different direction.  I'm about to order some books, and I will be talking about them as I read.  Five more weeks left in the college semester, then I can garden, think, read, write, and cook.  Here's hoping I can make it through these coming weeks.  A week of sleep has helped.  No nervous breakdown yet THIS year. 

Enjoy the following, from the movie "Good Will Hunting."   Did you notice it?  Do you remember it?  I'm ashamed to say I didn't remember it at all.

why not work for the NSA?
Will Hunting played by Matt Damon
in the movie Good Will Hunting

Why shouldn't I work for the N.S.A.? That's a tough one, but I'll give it a shot. Say I'm working at N.S.A. Somebody puts a code on my desk, something nobody else can break. So I take a shot at it and maybe I break it. And I'm real happy with myself, 'cause I did my job well. But maybe that code was the location of some rebel army in North Africa or the Middle East. Once they have that location, they bomb the village where the rebels were hiding and fifteen hundred people I never had a problem with get killed. Now the politicians are sayin', "Send in the marines to secure the area" 'cause they don't give a shit. It won't be their kid over there, gettin' shot. Just like it wasn't them when their number was called, 'cause they were pullin' a tour in the National Guard. It'll be some guy from Southie takin' shrapnel in the ass. And he comes home to find that the plant he used to work at got exported to the country he just got back from. And the guy who put the shrapnel in his ass got his old job, 'cause he'll work for fifteen cents a day and no bathroom breaks. Meanwhile my buddy from Southie realizes the only reason he was over there was so we could install a government that would sell us oil at a good price. And of course the oil companies used the skirmish to scare up oil prices so they could turn a quick buck. A cute little ancillary benefit for them but it ain't helping my buddy at two-fifty a gallon. And naturally they're takin' their sweet time bringin' the oil back, and maybe even took the liberty of hiring an alcoholic skipper who likes to drink martinis and play slalom with the icebergs, and it ain't too long 'til he hits one, spills the oil and kills all the sea life in the North Atlantic. So my buddy's out of work and he can't afford to drive, so he's got to walk to the job interviews, which sucks 'cause the schrapnel in his ass is givin' him chronic hemorroids. And meanwhile he's starvin' 'cause every time he tries to get a bite to eat the only blue plate special they're servin' is North Atlantic scrod with Quaker State. So what do I think? I'm holdin' out for somethin' better. Why not just shoot my buddy, take his job and give it to his sworn enemy, hike up gas prices, bomb a village, club a baby seal, hit the hash pipe and join the National Guard? I could be elected president.

 

Saturday, April 2, 2005

SAME SONG, SECOND VERSE


Take action today!

Step 1: Click here to send a message to your Senators urging them to vote “NO” on the “nuclear option.”

Step 2: Sign the Feminist Majority’s petition opposing a change in the rules of the Senate to elimnate filibusters for judicial nominees.

President Bush and Senate Republicans are stacking the federal courts with right-wing, anti-women’s rights judges. But they are not satisfied. They want to prevent any meaningful opposition to these judges.

So far, only 10 nominees to the appellate courts have been blocked – while 204 nominees to the federal courts have been confirmed.

Yet in an unprecedented abuse of power, Senate Republicans, led by Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (TN), are outrageously attempting to change the rules of the Senate to prevent even these filibusters of judicial nominees.

Right now, it takes only 41 votes to continue debate (filibuster) and block a vote on a nominee. It takes 60 votes to end debate and force a full Senate vote. The so-called “nuclear option” would eliminate the use of the filibuster for all judicial nominees, allowing the Senate to confirm them with only 51 votes (or 50 votes and the tie-breaking vote of the Vice President). Democrats only have 45 votes in the Senate, plus Senator Jim Jeffords (I-VT).

But let us not be fooled. The real purpose of their so-called “nuclear option” is to make the Senate a rubber stamp for all judicial nominees, including Supreme Court nominees. Republicans want a free ride when it comes to stacking the Supreme Court with far-right, reactionary justices. That’s why they are so intent on changing the rules before a Supreme Court resignation occurs.

The confirmation of judicial nominees should take a supermajority of 60 Senators to ensure that a weak majority is never able to ramrod through lifetime appointments to the federal courts. If we do not stop the “nuclear option,” then this President, who has won two elections by the narrowest of margins, will be able to not only stack the lower courts but also the Supreme Court – which would change the landscape of this country for the next 40 years.

The filibuster is an important tool to allow a strong minority to apply the brakes. If our judges are to be not just considered political ideologues, but people with judicial temperament representing mainstream society, then we cannot allow judges to be railroaded through the Senate confirmation process with only 51 votes.

Take action today! Click here to send a message to your Senators urging them to vote “NO” on the “nuclear option.”

…and…

Sign the Feminist Majority’s petition opposing a change in the rules of the Senate to eliminate filibusters for judicial nominees.

For Equality,

Ellie Smeal
President
Feminist Majority

Friday, April 1, 2005

OKAY AMY, THIS ONE'S FOR YOU

An interesting email in my box this morning - a journal friend wanting me to write something on the attempts to end the tradition of Senate filibuster which are currently being threatened by the Senate Republicans.  I have written several times on the administration's renomination of William G. Myers, and other utterly unqualified candidates, to seats on the federal judicial bench.  The Republicans plan, I believe, is to try to get rid of the filibuster now, with these federal court candidates, so that when the time comes to vote on Supreme Court nominees, the road will be clear.  This is all understandably confusing, but there are plenty of places to get all the information you could possibly want.

"Why is this an environmental issue?"  may be your first question.  Earthjustice can answer that question for you in its many pages on this whole subject.  Here it is, however, in a nutshell:

"Judicial appointments rarely are thought of as an environmental issue, but they have become an environmental priority. Because so many environmental enforcement issues end up in court, federal judges play a crucial role in deciding not only how to interpret and enforce, but also whether to uphold or strike down, the laws that protect our nation's clean water, clean air, communities, and special natural places. Unfortunately, activist judges often place their interests first and prevent laws from being carried out as Congress intended. [Learn more about "What's at Stake".]

As Presidential appointees, judges must be confirmed by the Senate. [See Senators Speak Out.] Once confirmed, every federal District (trial) Court, Circuit Court of Appeals, and Supreme Court judge holds the position for life, giving every confirmation long-lasting impact. Topreserve the integrity of the federal judiciary, each nominee must base decisions on fairness and honesty, not hostility to balanced safety, heath, and environmental protections.

Never before have the stakes been higher. With many key vacancies in the lifetime federal judiciary, there is dangerous potential for an extreme, ideological reshaping of the courts, instead of an effort to place in power judges who make decisions based solely on the law. A growing number of judges already serving on the federal bench are exceeding their proper role by rewriting laws passed by Congress, in order to serve their own personal preferences. A few more judges out of this mold will tip the balance in many courts and seriously weaken, if not nullify, many of our landmark environmental statutes. [See Commentary & News.]"

The first one who will probably be put up to try to eliminate the Democratic filibuster is my friend William G. Myers.  He was already voted down for this federal appointment last July.  Again, Earthjustice has all the info on this guy you could stand to read. Here you will find a link to numerous editorials, from newspapers all over the country, with compelling reasons this man should not be in charge of environmental decisions over much of the West. Amazing that there is such a consensus on this guy, and yet here he is, up for that judicial bench again.  Even more, very clearly laid out, evidence of his dreadful environmental record, from Community Rights Council, here.

So, what the Republicans are hoping to use is what they are calling "the nuclear option," to stop the good old tradition of filibuster.  From PeoplefortheAmericanWay, in the "Independent Judiciary" section, a simple and clear explanation of what this is.  Here is the heart of it:

"As the name suggests, the "nuclear option" is a radical tactic that would prohibit senators from using filibusters against extremist judicial nominees. Right-wing senators and leaders are supporting this destructive action because they want to guarantee the Senate confirmation of far-right ideologues to our federal courts, especially the Supreme Court.

The "nuclear option" is actually a
series of steps that right-wing senators would take to eliminate the filibuster. The "nuclear" attack would likely begin with one party’s senators provoking a filibuster, most likely by trying to force a confirmation vote on an out-of-the-mainstream appeals court nominee. A senator would then object, claiming that the filibuster cannot be used on a judicial nomination. Vice President Cheney or another senator presiding over the Senate would rule in the Radical Right's favor, and then that ruling would be appealed. A simple majority (with Vice President Cheney as the tie-breaking vote if necessary) would then uphold the ruling, and the filibuster would be history."

An even simpler explanation from Earthjustice:

"The Senate Republican leadership is threatening to circumvent long-standing Senate rules in order to force simple-majority votes on controversial judicial nominees, even though the Senate has confirmed over 200 of President Bush's nominees to appeals courts, district courts and the Court of Federal Claims, while blocking only ten. These proposals would avoid formally changing the Senate rules on filibusters by "re-interpreting" them. Even proponents have recognized the extreme nature of this radical proposal--referring to it as the "nuclear option," because resorting to it would "blow up" the Senate's ability to function on a wide range of issues."

The following resources discuss these proposals:

(Senator Byrd's speeches are a reminder of what the Senate used to be.  They make cracking good reading.  Too bad he's 87, or somewhere in that neighborhood.)

This is an issue that will affect our lives for many years after the current Bush administration (there seem to more Bushes waiting in the wings, or something.  I can't figure out a metaphor without getting nasty.) is gone.  Read Myers' previous history, in the linked editorials above, or on the Earthjustice pages that discuss the nominees.  See if this is the "impartial" judge you want making big decisions about public land use in our beautiful West.  Call your Senators, doesn't matter if  you think you know how they'll vote.  Call them.  Yours is the voice that needs to be heard.  Keep the filibuster, boot Myers and the rest of the bad nominees out the door - again.

IT'S NO APRIL FOOL'S TRICK, EITHER

  The Prophecy of Oil
    By William Rivers Pitt
    t r u t h o u t | Perspective

    Monday 07 March 2005

    On August 27, 1859, Edwin Drake's oil well in Titusville, Pennsylvania struck a gusher, making him the man credited with drilling the first commercially successful oil well in America. In the time between then and now, the world has burned through about 900 billion barrels of Drake's discovery.

    Global daily oil consumption today stands at around 82 million barrels, and many experts believe the emerging mega-industrialization of nations like China and India will cause that daily consumption to reach at least 120 million barrels a day by the year 2030. Not to fear, however; ExxonMobil believes there are some 14 trillion barrels still in the ground, including nonconventional resource fields like the tar sands of Canada and petroleum-rich shale in the western United States.

    In the last several years, a theory known as 'Peak Oil' has been working its way into the mainstream. Chief proponent of this theory is Dr. Colin Campbell, a retired oil-industry geologist now living in Ireland. Dr. Campbell, who has been raising warnings about Peak Oil for some 15 years, believes that global consumption of oil is surpassing not only the amount of oil being pulled from the ground, not only the amount of oil left to be found, but is also surpassing the ability of technology to compensate for what he sees as an inevitable and looming shortfall.

    The 'peak,' believes Campbell, will come as early as next year, heralding a steady rise in prices and the end of cheap oil as we have known it, causing a seismic shock within the global economy. "The perception of this decline changes the entire world we know," said Dr. Campbell in a September 2004 report from the Wall Street Journal. "Up till now we've been living in a world with the assumption of growth driven by oil. Now we have to face the other side of the mountain."

    The oil industry, predictably, considers Campbell to be a doomsaying loony, an espouser of flat-earth economics who totally discounts both the vast amounts of oil yet to be drilled, and the ability of technology to find more. Their argument is not without merit, as claims that the petroleum paradigm is on the edge of extinction are as old as the industry itself. Sixteen years after Drake's well struck oil, for example, Pennsylvania's chief geologist warned it would soon run out. Clearly, this was not the case. Campbell himself has not helped his credibility; the expected date of imminent catastrophe quoted by the doctor has been pushed back with regularity since 1990 as each non-disastrous year passes with the industry still intact.

    More and more, however, noted energy analysts are coming to heed Campbell's warnings. The respected Washington-based consulting firm PFC Energy published a report endorsing his theory, noting that the exact date of the catastrophe is less important than the fact that it is coming. PFC was hesitant at first to hang its hat on Dr. Campbell, but came to the conclusion that the decline in global oil discoveries has become so dramatic that it cannot be ignored, and that this decline calls into question whether technology can save the industry before the clock winds down to zero.

    Ultimately, the debate over whether 'Peak Oil' is a looming reality or merely Chicken-Littlism is wide of the point the planet must come to address. Posit for the moment that ExxonMobil and the rest of the petroleum industry are correct in their belief that trillions of barrels of oil await discovery and drilling, and that the petroleum paradigm is safe and secure for centuries to come. Even if this assumption is true, the fact remains that the paradigm itself is a suicide ride leading ever downward to danger and, ultimately, disaster.

    No one can question the benefits oil has brought to global society. Here in America, millions of homes are heated with oil. Millions of cars make it easier for millions of people to get to work and take care of their business. Millions of trucks and ships have delivered billions of tons of produce to all points on the compass; one could argue that the defining truth of the luxury inherent in Western society is the ability to stand in a snowbank in Maine and enjoy a fresh pineapple from Hawaii. Millions of people can get from New York to Los Angeles in a day, thanks to airplanes. The incomes and livelihoods of millions - workers in industry and agriculture and transportation and food services to name a few - depend upon oil.

    All of these benefits, all of these achievements, along with countless others, come from the drilling and processing of petroleum. Oil infuses virtually every aspect of our civilization. It is the basis of the global economy. It is the inescapable ingredient that creates, supports and sustains the Western world as we know it.

    Yet even as oil gives generously with one hand, it takes grievously with the other. Even if the petroleum industry is correct and there remain trillions of barrels to be plumbed, that oil is located for the most part in some of the most dangerous and unstable places on the planet. That danger and instability has been created, in no small part, by the fact that oil can be found there.

    Oil revenues fund global terrorism. Oil resources motivate wars, and more wars, and more wars. This is the sharp other edge of the sword; if the petroleum industry is correct and oil can be found and drilled for generations to come, that means generations to come will be required to share the death and destruction we endure today in the grubbing for oil. There is no escaping this.

    Oil is dirty, and its byproducts are doing demonstrable and ever-increasing damage to the environment which sustains life on Earth. Thanks to tanker spills, dumping and the inevitable leakage of petroleum byproducts from the global shipping industry, every centimeter of ocean on the planet is covered by a microscopically thin skim of oil.

    All of the scooters, motorcycles, cars, trucks, buses, airplanes, tanks, troop transports, along with the innumerable smokestacks spewing the byproducts of industry into the air from one side of the globe to the other, are releasing dramatic levels of poison into the atmosphere every minute of every day, with no letup in sight. This is chewing inexorably into planetary stability, melting the ice caps and creating what has become known as the greenhouse effect.

    Finally, and most importantly, our planetary addiction to oil, combined with the incomprehensibly huge profits to be made from the development and sale of oil, have led to the establishment of political and economic power combines that are as dominant as petroleum itself. Governments all around the world, most notably here in America but also in places like Saudi Arabia, China and Russia, are either beholden to petroleum power combines or controlled outright by them.

    When Vice President Dick Cheney, himself a creation of petroleum combines, memorably stated that it is the God-given right of every American to consume as much cheap gas as they can while driving the largest SUVs they can find, he was speaking the gospel of ascendant power. Neither reasonable argument nor empirical data can shake the faithful from this premise.

    So long as there is oil and trillions of dollars to be made from it, this gospel will continue to be preached even as all the attendant problems that come with oil attack the basic underpinnings of life and liberty. The paradigm will be continued by any means necessary so long as the ones made powerful by it reign supreme. This begets a cycle of violence, pollution, corruption, greed and ever-increasing power for the few over the many that has nowhere to go but, inevitably, down.

    Only a maniac would hope for the immediate collapse of the petroleum paradigm and the social, economic and military chaos that would ensue. If all the oil in the world disappeared tomorrow morning, millions of people would be dead by sundown, and billions more would follow soon after into the grave. None but the purest of psychopath would look forward to a catastrophe of this magnitude.

    Something, however, must be done. If the 'Peak Oil' theory is an accurate prediction of the imminent future, something must be done. If 'Peak Oil' is only a myth, something must still be done. One way or the other, this paradigm is going to destroy itself, and it will take a monstrous number of people with it.

    If the powerful few who control the reins of our oil-dependant world are smart, they will invest a considerable chunk of their profits into a crash program to develop a new, sustainable source of energy. This program must dwarf the Manhattan Project in scope, funding and immediacy. Human ingenuity is boundless, and something like cold fusion merely awaits the desire and effort to find it and make it functional.

    Those addicted to the power and profits given them by oil can patent this new energy source and slowly but surely use it to supplant petroleum as the dominant truth of the planet. The power and the profits will be there for them in this, and the overhead required to locate, process and distribute oil while killing anyone who might disrupt the flow will cease to exist. Along the way, the air and water we need will lose its gritty, metallic taste. In other words, nothing will change and everything will change. While many will be justifiably outraged by an argument that essentially advocates for the powerful to remain powerful, few other options that do not include a global catastrophe appear to be on the table, and the clock is running.

    Will this happen in time? Will it happen at all? It is, unfortunately, doubtful. Among other reasons the powerful have for maintaining this smoggy status quo is the attendant profits to be made from waging wars over oil. The war-making business is a trillion-dollar global industry. If technology were introduced that rendered oil obsolete, the deep well of cash to be made by arming and training armies would become a dry hole.

    If a metaphor is needed to cement the final destination of this paradigm, consider again Edwin Drake, who got this ball rolling 146 years ago. Despite being the man to 'discover' petroleum, despite being the father of what grew into a fabulously rich industry, Drake himself went broke as a result of his overextended speculation. He died in 1880 a penniless old man. In Drake we find the prophecy of oil, a resource that gives much but takes more, a resourse that will leave us all sooner or later holding our empty hands up to an empty sky